By Sarah N. Lynch, Ned Parker and Peter Eisler
WASHINGTON (Reuters) -As the federal public corruption prosecution of former Tennessee House Speaker Glen Casada neared trial this spring, his lawyers made one last effort to kill the case, by petitioning senior Justice Department officials that it was “weaponization,” according to three people familiar with the matter.
Under President Donald Trump, the department in February created a “Weaponization Working Group” meant to identify improper politically motivated cases, a response to what the Republican says without evidence was the misuse of prosecutorial resources against him under his Democratic predecessor, Joe Biden.
In court filings, prosecutors said that Casada’s lawyers met with a senior Justice Department official on March 24, where they alleged the “Deep State” had initiated a “weaponized” prosecution and they sought dismissal of the charges.
The plan almost worked, according to three people familiar with the matter.
With the Deputy Attorney General’s office poised to kill the case, prosecutors in the Justice Department’s Public Integrity Section pushed back, reviewing their evidence with the higher-ups, the sources said, adding that the Nashville U.S. Attorney’s office and the Criminal Division also supported the case.
The request was rejected the next week, according to court filings. Both Casada and the DOJ declined to comment.
The case is among at least seven Reuters identified where defense attorneys or Justice Department officials have sought to have prosecutions reviewed for possible dismissal, citing Trump’s “weaponization” argument or making other arguments about weaknesses in the cases.
In a Tuesday speech, Acting Assistant Attorney General Matthew Galeotti urged defense attorneys to be “conscientious about what, when and how” they appeal prosecutors’ decisions.
“Seeking premature relief, mischaracterizing prosecutorial conduct, or otherwise failing to be an honest broker actively undermines our system,” Galeotti said.
The increase in lobbying started not long after the Weaponization Working Group was created, and after the department’s February decision to dismiss criminal corruption charges against New York City Mayor Eric Adams, six sources familiar with the dynamic told Reuters.
To date, the Adams case is the only one to be dismissed over “weaponization,” three of those sources told Reuters.
The lobbying wave comes as the Trump administration has dramatically scaled back the Justice Department’s Public Integrity Section, reduced the size of its foreign bribery unit and advised department attorneys that tax enforcement is “not a priority,” two of the people familiar with the matter said.
A department spokesman said the DOJ will “continue to enforce our nation’s tax laws.”
Trump has said the changes are necessary to root out Justice Department lawyers he derides as “hacks and radicals” for prosecuting him and some supporters while he was out of power.
NEW GROUP HAS BROAD REMIT
The working group is empowered to review any “civil or criminal enforcement authority of the United States” exercised under Biden.
A lawyer for Robert Burke, a former Navy admiral who was convicted in May on bribery charges, wrote to the department ahead of trial raising concerns about witness credibility, which failed to convince prosecutors to drop the case.
Now the lawyer, Tim Parlatore — a former Trump defense lawyer — plans to seek a pardon.
“I would be crazy not to at least inquire about a pardon,” Parlatore said.
Another example is a case involving billionaire Britannia Financial Group founder Julio Martín Herrera-Velutini, who is facing an August trial alongside Puerto Rico’s former governor on bribery charges.
Herrera-Velutini is represented by former Trump defense attorney Chris Kise, who has sought to convince the Justice Department to dismiss or reduce the charges, though the outcome of such efforts is unclear, three people familiar with the case told Reuters. Kise did not return requests for comment, and Reuters could not determine what arguments he has made to the department about the case.
WEAPONIZATION REVIEW
While many of the reviews of cases are spurred by aggressive lobbying, some requests are coming from within the DOJ.
In early February, prosecutors in the department’s Tax Division were ordered by senior Justice Department officials to write a memo explaining why the prosecution of Paul Walczak was not an example of “weaponization,” two of the people familiar with the matter told Reuters.
Walczak, of Florida, pleaded guilty in November to not paying employment taxes and not filing his individual income tax returns, and the trial team was preparing for his sentencing.
Prosecutors were baffled, the people said, and only discovered after a few Google searches that Walczak’s mother Elizabeth Fago was a Trump donor who, according to a New York Times report, hosted a political fundraiser where portions of a diary written by Biden’s daughter Ashley were circulated.
The department let the case proceed, and Walczak was sentenced to 18 months in prison. Trump in April spared him any prison with a pardon, which according to the New York Times, was handed down shortly after Fago attended a $1 million fundraising dinner for Trump.
The White House did not respond to a request for comment on the pardon.
An attorney for Walczak said he was unaware of any interactions by the defense team with the Weaponization Working Group. In a statement, the Fago and Walczak families said media reports have painted an “incomplete and inaccurate” picture of the pardon application, and that Trump had “ample grounds to grant the pardon on the merits.”
Although no criminal prosecutions have been dismissed, prosecutors are bracing for impact since Trump in May named Ed Martin, a supporter of Trump’s false claims that his 2020 election defeat was the result of fraud, to lead the working group and serve as pardon attorney.
Martin has already successfully encouraged Trump to approve pardons for some of the president’s supporters, according to his social media posts.
Casada, who was convicted at trial in May on multiple counts of fraud, money laundering and bribery, is now expected to seek a pardon, a person familiar with the matter said.
“We’ve also been getting more folks coming forward within the government as well as outside, saying, ‘Can you look at this? Can you look at that?'” Martin recently told reporters.
“It’s a problem that seems to be growing faster than we can capture it.”
(Reporting by Sarah N. Lynch and Peter Eisler in Washington and Ned Parker in New York, additional reporting by Andrew Goudsward; Editing by Scott Malone and Deepa Babington)
