×

Prominent Indian free speech groups say police ordered X accounts removed

By Thomson Reuters Nov 4, 2026 | 5:32 AM

BENGALURU, Nov 4 (Reuters) – Two of India’s most prominent digital rights and free speech groups said police in New Delhi have asked X to remove their accounts, accusing them ​of defaming a Hindu nationalist group linked to Prime ‌Minister Narendra Modi.

Free-speech activists and opposition politicians, including from India’s Congress party, say the move is a way to curb dissent in the world’s most populous nation.

India, which has more than 1.1 billion internet subscribers, says its directives ‌to ​platforms target unlawful or misleading content and ⁠respect lawful expression.

The Delhi ⁠Police, which is controlled by the federal government, sent notices to take down the X accounts of the Internet Freedom Foundation (IFF) and India’s Software Freedom Law Center, called SFLC.in, according to ​a copy of the directives posted by IFF on X on Tuesday.

The police alleged the groups defamed the Rashtriya Swayamsevak ⁠Sangh (RSS), the Hindu nationalist group from which ⁠Modi’s ruling party emerged. The orders referred to ​posts by the digital rights groups about a purported October 29 legal ​notice they received in the name of the RSS, ‌calling for the groups to stop opposing content-blocking directives from the government.

Such “posts are defamatory towards the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh,” read one order signed by Delhi Police special commissioner (crime), Hargobinder Singh Dhaliwal.

Reuters could not ⁠independently verify the directives.

X, the RSS and Delhi Police did not respond to requests for comment.

“Those who expose censorship must not become its ⁠targets,” Amnesty said in ‌a post on X.

The IFF said it ⁠would challenge the requests in court unless they ​were withdrawn, ‌while SFLC.in described the requests as unlawful and ​disproportionate.

The two ⁠accounts were still active on Wednesday afternoon. The IFF and SFLC.in use their X accounts to publicise blocking orders, including recent restrictions on accounts and posts related to anti-government protests, and their legal challenges to them.

(Reporting by Munsif Vengattil in Bengaluru; Editing by Aditya Kalra ​and Emelia Sithole-Matarise)