×

Bank of England’s Taylor views case for rate hike as ‘not compelling’

By Thomson Reuters Sep 29, 2026 | 10:42 AM

LONDON, Sept 29 (Reuters) – The case for raising interest rates will remain weak until high energy prices translate into clearer signs of inflation spreading across the broader economy, Bank of England ​Monetary Policy Committee member Alan Taylor said on Tuesday.

Taylor – who ‌set a relatively high bar for future tightening when he voted to keep rates on hold earlier this month – said that the recent surge in gas and oil prices “could push headline inflation considerably higher over the winter.”

But Taylor said this alone ‌was ​not a reason to raise rates, and ⁠that evidence for second-round inflation ⁠effects was “scant,” with food inflation slower than expected and underlying pay growth remaining consistent with on-target inflation.

“The case for further rate increases is not compelling to me unless energy prices remain high for ​an extended period and also generate clearer signals of a transmission into broader inflation persistence,” he said in a lecture to Britain’s ⁠National Institute of Social and Economic Research.

Taylor ⁠was part of the 6-3 majority that voted to ​keep the bank rate on hold at 3.75% earlier this month and ​seemed further than some of his colleagues from voting for a ‌rate rise.

He wrote in minutes of the rate decision that he would want to see “clear evidence that second-round effects are en route” before raising interest rates.

The BoE earlier this month forecast that inflation could exceed ⁠4% early next year, up from 3.1% in August. British inflation has spent almost all of the past five years above its 2% target.

However, Taylor ⁠said he did not ‌view the current outlook as similar to 2022, ⁠when Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine caused oil prices ​to ‌surge, inflaming a tight post-COVID labour market and sending ​inflation into ⁠double digits.

Rising public expectations for inflation did not necessarily offer a good guide to future inflation risks, he added.

“Inflation in many energy-intensive goods and services categories has not accelerated as one might have expected after such a visible energy shock,” he said.

(Reporting by David Milliken; Editing by Sam Tabahriti ​and Mark Porter)