×

India allows regulator to raise cancer drug prices to tackle shortage

By Thomson Reuters Jun 11, 2026 | 4:38 AM

By Rishika Sadam

June 11 (Reuters) – India has given the go-ahead to a regulator for raising prices of platinum-based cancer drugs that have been in short supply due ​to a spike in raw material costs, according ‌to a letter seen by Reuters.

Patients in the world’s most populous country have been grappling with shortages of platinum-based cancer drugs cisplatin and carboplatin, as hospitals, especially government-run facilities, run short.

Prices of the drugs, used ‌to ​treat cancers of the lung, ovaries and ⁠gall bladder, are capped ⁠by the government.

India’s department of pharmaceuticals, a part of the chemicals ministry, approved the National Pharmaceutical Pricing Authority’s request for revision of prices of these drugs in a letter ​dated June 7.

The regulator had sought approval to raise prices under exceptional provisions of the law that can be ⁠used in public interest, according to ⁠the letter.

“The government has approved a price increase. ​The final decision will be taken by NPPA as it ​is an independent regulatory body which works under the ‌government,” a government source told Reuters on the condition of anonymity.

Platinum prices have more than doubled, according to industry experts, driven by constrained supply, robust demand and dwindling inventories as the ⁠metal replaces palladium in automotive applications.

Drugmakers had temporarily halted production of cisplatin and carboplatin as they were unable to secure platinum-based raw ⁠materials or pass ‌on higher costs to consumers.

A range of ⁠generic drugmakers make these platinum-based chemotherapy drugs, ​including Cipla, ‌Intas Pharmaceuticals, and oncology specialists such as ​Naprod Life ⁠Sciences and Venus Remedies.

India has also approved price increases for two anti-tetanus immunoglobulin injections because of a rise in active pharmaceutical ingredient costs, according to the letter cited above.

The pharmaceuticals department did not respond to requests for comment.

(Reporting by Rishika Sadam; Editing ​by Mrigank Dhaniwala)